welcome to TAN Autobot. You must join us and tell us embarrassing stories about Wolffe for all of us to find humorous. And of course we would be laughing WITH your friend Wolffe, not at him. We love him here. *cough cough*
the man is a fucking lunatic. how exactly will segregated buses solve the problem? i expect there will be a lot more racially motivated crime if people are not allowed to integrate with eachother. i wonder if Rush has the guts to tell a black person to GTFO the front of the bus. i also wonder how much spin would be put on the situation.
well, its gonna auto promote stuff based on view, comments, tins/tans, link views etc, will be betterer i think
this might get complex. just make sure we have some decent anti spam defences. id hate to see this site turn into a spamfest. i liked the whole raiding of the spammer sites, but we need more organisation.
on a separate note. hows about bringing the forums back? not in a big way, but ya know it would stop these pointless 3 line blogs that are done just to raise attention to an issue. IRC is all good but some of us have bosses looking over our shoulders
Guys, this isn't a job, you can't tell people what to do. If people want to tin/tan, they will, someone telling them to won't make them, it'll only piss them off. This type of shit was on sw every other week, and look at it now.
^ this
"Scobiewan" wrote:
Once we have more members, we'll have more user input, simple as that.
well we managed to make JD fuck off, so we arent exactly doing too well on that front. ive noticed that the news posted here tends to be pretty old by the time it pops up. moar blogs methinks! fuck, i have nothing to write about though :(
So not one of these got through to execution, but 9/11 went off without a hitch...
the 9/11 terrorist attack was done by muslims from poorly educated and humble areas of the world, these plots were done by christians from poorly educated and arrogant areas of the world.
so who do you think put more effort in to the "make sure we dont get caught" plan and who do you think put more effort in to the "we wont get caught because we are awesome... pass me another beer, Randy" plan?
when you continuously cut funding to schools and allow useless 'debate' to happen over things that actually exist (plate techtonics, evolution) what do you expect to happen?
@meds, nice work mate, but he won't listen, he never listen's. I think thats his game, just keep arguing until everyone else gets bored and gives up. lol
@KarnivOre
Who's dangerous? Nova? I've been lurking Shoutwire since the days of Torrentspy. I didn't see exactly what went down with Nova, but I lack caring as he's never done anything to me.
you seriously need to understand he will send you semen in the post.
^Well the thing with Shoutwire is that there is like no one there. I would comment relentlessly but they bann me so I am not gonna force help down someones throat. That is what my cock is for. Also glad to see you owned Scobie. He won't kknow it though since his mind is drenched in THC and booze.
^this man is fucking dangerous, sir. i suggest you run!
yeah, as soon as someone grabs a big stick like that, charge them. the fastest moving point on the weapon will be the end of it, so getting in close both reduces his ability to swing it and the kinetic force you receive should he hit you with it anyways (because you will be hit by the middle of it)
i personally, being a golden gloves boxer from texas, would have laid him out flat in less than 5 seconds.
Sounds good. Although I can image it going completly wrong and the end product being a fuck of underground explosion, which will at least make good tv.
so explain how huge, televised explosions count as "going completly wrong"? because that shit is a definite victory in my book
There's this shit stage inbetween where you look like a cross between an emo and a mushroom, if you can grin and bare it long enough, eventually your hair will flatten down and you'll look less like a twat and more like a hippy.
the mushroom stage is not fun. once it goes past your neck tho, all the hard work is rewarded
Actually, the EU said they can't keep records, and if you think you can't do anything about it, you're wrong. You just bring a case against them, if everyone did, there's no way they could afford not to abide by the law. Of course, people won't because they're already afraid of dealing with the cops. Fuck da police!
He then rewrote data on the card, reversing the bearer's status from "not entitled to benefits" to "entitled to benefits".
Why am I not surprised that the potential for benefit fraud was the Daily Mail's foremost concern?
the very next sentence is
He then added fresh content that would be visible to any police officer or security official who scanned the card, saying, "I am a terrorist - shoot on sight."
whilst the mail is still a fearmongering anti-immigration-fest, i think in this article they are pointing at the ease of which someone is able to edit the very information that these ID cards were meant to make use of, such as "information to keep us safe from terrorists"
fido, not so! there are 3 papers in london that are given away entirely free (the metro, the london lite and thelondonpaper") and they make a lot of money through advertising. because the paper is free and in prominent places (often actually handed out by uniformed newspaper employees at tube stations and shopping centres) they reach a much wider audience and so can claim a lot more in advertising, enough to cover overheads, pay the reporters and make a tidy profit.
online works similarly, as news sites linking to eachother will likely generate traffic for both sites and with the number of people that blog for free, a lot of the stories can be gleaned for free, meaning less need to pay traditional reporters.
whilst this may seem like a bad thing for reporters, i think that a lot of the stories that reporters get paid for (at least in UK newspapers) are so frivolous and un-newsworthy that it is a wonder how anyone would consider parting with their money for it!
i dont think the internet is killing journalism, i think it is evolving it
you forget one thing, adblock plus.
you see i dont have a problem with seeing ads, as long as they arent noisy or invading whatever the hell it is im reading. seeing an advert for tshirts is not so much a problem for me when i know the website itself is free and useful
fido, not so! there are 3 papers in london that are given away entirely free (the metro, the london lite and thelondonpaper") and they make a lot of money through advertising. because the paper is free and in prominent places (often actually handed out by uniformed newspaper employees at tube stations and shopping centres) they reach a much wider audience and so can claim a lot more in advertising, enough to cover overheads, pay the reporters and make a tidy profit.
online works similarly, as news sites linking to eachother will likely generate traffic for both sites and with the number of people that blog for free, a lot of the stories can be gleaned for free, meaning less need to pay traditional reporters.
whilst this may seem like a bad thing for reporters, i think that a lot of the stories that reporters get paid for (at least in UK newspapers) are so frivolous and un-newsworthy that it is a wonder how anyone would consider parting with their money for it!
i dont think the internet is killing journalism, i think it is evolving it
*koff* woffe's a mongo *koff*