It's trying to contract together from both ends, with the bottom trying to tighten upwards, gravity acts as a counterbalance and makes it look like it's floating.
Not saying I actively seek the approval of the site but I genuinely do care what you all think of me to an extent.
Fag.
Matt2k35 wrote:
WIN.
DigitalAntichrist wrote:
otester wrote:
DigitalAntichrist wrote:
otester wrote:
Matt2k35 wrote:
Ironic because you keep posting what you think on here for us to give a shit about.
Just because I post something, doesn't mean I give a shit what you think about it.
Tell me, if the point of this site is to submit content and create discussion, what is the point of submitting if you don't care about the ensuing debate and the ideas put forward by others.
I'd love to feel shocked by your egocentricity, but frankly after having been here for so long and having read so much from you, it really is no surprise.
Edited comment.
And? You think self-editing in order to look better achieves anything? What I now find amusing is how you must be in "a pretty sore spot to give a fuck about what some douche bags think".
Plus: -Mothers unplugging power cords. -Uninvited guests. -n00bs. -Unwanted advances from girlfriends. -Interruptions of power, most commonly caused by pets. -Children. -Anyone who doesn't seem to understand the sacrament of gaming.
Don't be so sure. For instance, cells have enzymes that actively change nucleotides (more specificallynucleobases) by adding a methyl group, a heritable condition which plays a huge role in body development. But that's just basic stuff, we are discovering more and more important mechanisms that are very essential to organisms. And we haven't even touched the information that is created in RNA. Biochemists are giving me the impression that RNA might be more important than DNA at the moment.
Each base pair is a quaternary bit, i.e. it can encode 4 states
This is probably not true. I think there are exceptions to the rule ATGC in DNA, even in humans.
Edit: The bases are subject to various chemical modifications which are not silent in gene expression. This should elevate the amount of information available a little.
i saw this documentary once and this little lost honey badger is walking around at dusk and he bumps into a massive rattle snake who's trying to bed down for the night and hella pissed off for being disturbed.
vicious battle follows with the honey badger being bitten repeatedly by the massive rattler.
eventually the little honey badger gets on top of the snake who sinks its venemous fangs into the badgers side for the last time before the badger chomps through its spine.
the rattler dies in the little badgers jaws, is dropped to the badgers paws as it wobbles off a few feet before being overwhelmed by enough venom to kill many many people.
good night little honey badger, you fought valiantly.
BUT then the little fucker only goes and wakes up 3hrs later, struts back over to the rattler and eats the motherfucker up before loking for its next snack.
^It's funny how you consider yourself an authority in judging people. I've seen your views and comments on TAN, you have a sort of naiveté in your critique of the status quo in democracies. I mean, what sort of person will stand for anarchy when he/she thinks it's unstable? I know that democratic governance is not perfect, but at least it is self correcting. How the fuck can anyone survive in an anarchy when humans beings by their own nature cannot live another day without relying on one another?
Naive.
You do realize that in order to make a living and to progress, many resources are required such as financing, labour, regulating committees to ensure health and safety etc... Frankly, (call it argument from incredulity) I don't see how an anarchist can have all those without any type of consensus between people. Seriously, do you really believe it's possible to invent computers in total anarchy? How do you even make a productive and desirable community?
That's why realistically a constitutional republic based on liberty would be best, it means corruption is centralized and easy for a populace (should they choose) to eradicate.
You wouldn't see an end to government like structures under anarchy, locals would team up to help each other and to get things done, it just wouldn't have the authority that the state does currently.
That's no longer anarchy, that looks like you want communism or something?
^Taking money away from the Chav also means taking money away from other people that deserve/need the monthly payments to make ends meet. Because you can't simply write policy that singles out chavs. The real losers would be the sick, the elderly or single mothers heheh.
Call me what you want...A true democracy would destroy itself. Mankind can't handle total freedom.
There is no such thing as total freedom... This is one of the reasons why the likes of Otester and Wolffe are absolute full retards.
Democracy means you have to abide what society dictates, which most likely will turn out great for you simply because you have given your input and other human beings share your point of view and opposition will shut you down (regulation, control) etc... I'm too lazy to finish this line of thought. Do you see where I'm getting at?
How is a constitutional republic based on the ideas of liberty retarded?
Maybe I am confused, didn't you want elite ruling systems abolished?
^It's funny how you consider yourself an authority in judging people. I've seen your views and comments on TAN, you have a sort of naiveté in your critique of the status quo in democracies. I mean, what sort of person will stand for anarchy when he/she thinks it's unstable? I know that democratic governance is not perfect, but at least it is self correcting. How the fuck can anyone survive in an anarchy when humans beings by their own nature cannot live another day without relying on one another?
Naive.
You do realize that in order to make a living and to progress, many resources are required such as financing, labour, regulating committees to ensure health and safety etc... Frankly, (call it argument from incredulity) I don't see how an anarchist can have all those without any type of consensus between people. Seriously, do you really believe it's possible to invent computers in total anarchy? How do you even make a productive and desirable community?
Call me what you want...A true democracy would destroy itself. Mankind can't handle total freedom.
There is no such thing as total freedom... This is one of the reasons why the likes of Otester and Wolffe are absolute full retards.
Democracy means you have to abide what society dictates, which most likely will turn out great for you simply because you have given your input and other human beings share your point of view and opposition will shut you down (regulation, control) etc... I'm too lazy to finish this line of thought. Do you see where I'm getting at?
He wants unemployed people who studied environmental science with experience in project management to work at McDo's...
Fucking slap in the face.
I can't see myself moving away from my hometown... I mean all the networking I have is here, where else do I have a chance of getting a new job. Oh yeah, big news, I'm currently unemployed contract terminated :(...
.
;)
LAWWL