Because historically "The Gollywog" was always intended to be a negative depiction of Africans. Enid Blyton's Gollywog characters in Noddy were called Golly, Woggy and Nigger after all.
the OP is banking some dumbasses dont know this is the trans from the beauty pageant, hey i'll bite, I'd hit it,
Good for her!
Still not my type. Some of the grlywrlys I posted would probably be classified by some as more "manly" or "unwomanly," or whatever, but I'd still rather take one of them for a date.
I don't live in the UK, so I don't know ... but I find it highly implausible that they would've refused a termination of contract based on having dicks for roommates. Poor living conditions (behaviour of roommates, condition of housing, etc.) = immediate cause for termination.
It's not so much the lifestyle I generalize over, it's the mentality, lack of ambition and willingness to exceed beyond mediocrity and then the icing on the cake being to live off of others and sap their ambition away.
I started June 2001 ... guess what, I'm not bathing in 100 dollar bills. Of course, at no point did I ever intend, nor want, to become a capitalist whore.
Any finished games?
No. It didn't take me more than a few months and two failed attempts to realise I was an utter noob. Not only was I rushing things, but I realised you don't make a good — much less a great — game from a few pages of doodles and 1 or 2 months of designing behind the game. So I went on an epic adventure. 11 years later, 11 years of studying, learning, analysing, perceiving, experimenting, designing, it's starting to pay off.
I suggest you do the same, if you're interested in actually making something good ... otherwise just full steam ahead.
Then again, I'm not trying to beat the gaming industryat its own game. My world is gaming art, not graphics, not fame, not money.
^ Just get your ass to college and be done with it.
Best damn time of my life! Science, physics, history, language, sociology, psychology ... even if it doesn't give you a technical education, 3 years spent on nothing but learning about humanity and the world we live in was damn enlightening! Especially when you have great teachers with a passion for education and their field of study.
Education FTW!
Too bad depression and other shit fucked up my go at university ... :(
Considering he's been doing it for 3 years now, i doubt it was ever intended for mobiles. It's pretty obvious they wanted a full blown desktop game but realized they didn't have the abilities to compete with the REAL games on the market designed by high paid studio designers that went to school for 4 - 8 years.
I started May 2011...
I started June 2001 ... guess what, I'm not bathing in 100 dollar bills. Of course, at no point did I ever intend, nor want, to become a capitalist whore.
Even better yet: a super-duper movie operating system with flashy graphics and animations and cool TOP SECURITY logos and CRITICAL LOCKDOWN alerts ... that can't do anything other than turn the capslock LED on or off.
Ask him what the typical engagement range for a typical hunting scenario is, go on, ask him!
Google, the replacement for actual experience.
Lol, the point was to make otester look it up on the internet, because he desperately needs to ;)
It depends on several things, but a typical hunting range is around 100 m (at least in these parts), the vast majority of shootings are going to take place at this range. Remember that distance.
Now reread otesters comments on accuracy, user-friendliness, and .50 calibre machine gun ammo.
^ Or instead of choosing the mightiest cheater gun, you could be a real man and actually learn to shoot a gun long-range properly instead of talking about it on the internet like you're experienced in the matter.
Do you have a hand crank for your car?
Do you own a car? Is that all you got for me, internet gunman?
Ask him what the typical engagement range for a typical hunting scenario is, go on, ask him!
otester wrote:
tuoni wrote:
otester wrote:
It's like when APFSDS got introduced, means you don't have to bother range-finding most of the time and wind is less of an issue.
So it's not actually any more accurate, it just doesn't decelerate as fast.
I am talking about this from a user friendliness POV, not physics n shit.
Foolproof = only fools will use it, i.e. typical redneck hunting, "fast as fuck, flat as fuck, can't be bothered to aim."
It's like when APFSDS got introduced, means you don't have to bother range-finding most of the time and wind is less of an issue.
So it's not actually any more accurate, it just doesn't decelerate as fast.
InSOmnIaC wrote:
proofinlife wrote:
^ Or instead of choosing the mightiest cheater gun, you could be a real man and actually learn to shoot a gun long-range properly instead of talking about it on the internet like you're experienced in the matter.
I think I'm the only one on here that can honestly say they've actually fired an APFSDS lol
Yet it's otester that's running his mouth, pretending to know his shit! XD
well i havent researched remingtons offerings much.....i chose sako because of their reputation for being of the highest quality and accuracy... the accuracy is backed up by the manufacturer..... so that if your rifle.fails to.perform... they will make any neccessary changes required...
If you're worried about accuracy then get a .50 cal.
What exactly does bore diameter have to do with accuracy?
0.50 BMG*
Ok, and why would .50 BMG be inherently any more accurate? Apart from the obvious compensatory issues so colourfully explained by prof. proof.
well i havent researched remingtons offerings much.....i chose sako because of their reputation for being of the highest quality and accuracy... the accuracy is backed up by the manufacturer..... so that if your rifle.fails to.perform... they will make any neccessary changes required...
If you're worried about accuracy then get a .50 cal.
What exactly does bore diameter have to do with accuracy?
^ I bet otester has a heap of scrap materials on the outskirts of town, waiting, patiently waiting for the Greece market to fail ... ... ... then BAM!! Illuminati rich, bitch!! All is going according to plan!
Each base pair is a quaternary bit, i.e. it can encode 4 states
This is probably not true. I think there are exceptions to the rule ATGC in DNA, even in humans.
Edit: The bases are subject to various chemical modifications which are not silent in gene expression. This should elevate the amount of information available a little.
True, but for simplicity's sake I didn't bother, not to mention I don't have the knowledge to accurately take into account every possible mutation and state.
The bulk of the human genome isn't exactly going to be wildly mutated nucleotides, anyway.
The human genome consists of an average of 3,146 million base pairs
Each base pair is a quaternary bit, i.e. it can encode 4 states
Each quaternary bit is equivalent to 2 binary bits
The human ejaculation consists of an average of 500 million sperm cells
And if the assume an ejaculated lasts for 3 seconds, as mentioned in the picture
Then a single sperm contains approx. 750 MiB of information Then a single ejaculation contains approx. 349 PiB of information, or approx. 116 PiB/s in bandwidth.
"The import of this is that it made it cheaper and easier to bet down the value of a stock, while simultaneously devaluing the same stock by adding fake supply. This makes it easier to make money by destroying value, and is another example of how the over-financialization of the economy makes real, job-creating growth more difficult."
Holy shit !
Why are they allowed to do that ?
It's a free market ... but don't worry, they'll correct themselves.
^ So you're saying the BBC isn't 'statist, corporatist, defeatist, anti-business, Europhile and overwhelmingly biased to the left' ?
No, because the whole statement is contradiction in itself, most likely because the person who said it is dumb.
Leftist and anti-business, while at the same time being corporatist and Europhile, while ALSO being statist AND defeatist? I think I'm quite glad I skipped the "Mental Gymnastics 101" course. I never was any good at Newspeak.
^Spoken like a true left winger. They all believe the death penalty is nothing more than vengeful retribution.
Really? So where in your rages against tyranny and injustice is there room for the idea that a form of punishment which accepts that as much as 10% of those convicted and sentenced to death may be innocent... I should have thought that the idea of a branch of government murdering innocents would be something that made your blood boil, such is the afront to liberty, freedom, justice and all those things on which you so eloquently wax lyrical. But, no, apparently your only voiced concern is that any opposing view is 'typically socialist'. For shame, Wolfee, for shame.
Inalienable rights to freedom and liberty is exclusive. Criminals who render their inalienable rights by committing a crime are exempt from inalienable rights.
