On Saturday 23rd October, the TUC organised a series of coordinated demonstrations across the UK to protest against the cuts announced at the Comprehensive Spending Review. ThisAintNews.com Senior Political Correspondent Pablo 4:20 attended the Sheffield rally...
*DISABLE FILTER TO VIEW PICS CORRECTLY*
The GMB Union had organised a free coach for its members to travel from Leeds to Sheffield via Wakefield. It was clear as we set off that the coach was under-occupied, the members on board visibly disappointed. Once we stopped at Wakefield to pick up members from the regional head office where turnout was much better spirits on board seemed much higher. Some Communist Party members at the back of the coach were discussing politics in typically sectarian terms; some things on the left never change. I wondered briefly what they'd make of my own political affiliation to the Green Party . Probably best to keep quiet...
We arrived in Sheffield with a few hours to spare until the scheduled start of the rally. Enough time to grab some early lunch (inb4 mmateri: Lol! Course there was you fat fuck etc.). Walking from the GMB office to the local Wetherspoons McPub
TMI passed the city hall steps where the rally was to take place. Not much happening so far, just the Socialist Worker setting out a stall. It was a typically damp, drizzly Yorkshire morning. I wondered whether or not anyone would would show up at all in such shitty weather.
After lunch I returned to discover a square transormed into a bustling crowd of flags, banners and the essential

umbrellas; it was pissing down at this point but that hadn't dampened spirits one iota. There were loud chants of "Unite! General Strike!" Echoing through the mass of union members, general public and students (who were know doubt infuriated by the reneging of Liberal Democrats pledge to the NUS).
TUC Regional Secretary Bill Admas introduced the speakers, who varied from the cautious to the militant. Easily the most militant was Marion Lloyd from the PCS. Of the bank bailout she declared, "They shouldn't have bailed out the banks; they should've
nationalised them!" That was well received. Equally crowd pleasing was her call to follow the French example and stage a General Strike. The "Genral Strike" chant started up again.
At the more cautious end of the spectrum a nurse and union steward (I didn't get her name) warned against such radical measures. "We need to get the public on our side first" she implored. "We need to be
ready" She repeatedley emphasised.

Local Labour MPs Angela Smith and Paul Bloomfield were also in attendance. They expressed disquiet at the fact that their new party leader and MP for nereby Doncaster North , Ed Milliband, had declined to join them. It seems clear how the Labour Party establishment are responding to this crisis; sitting on the fence and hoping for the best.
The presence of a former Lib Dem Councillor who had defected Labour following the formation of the coalition offered an insight into the strategy that the anti-cuts coalition could pursue in bringing down the Governent. Surely if more of his ex-party colleagues were to grow a backbone, the coalition would rapidly fold.
After the crowd had disbursed we retired to McPub
TM for a post rally drink.

"Good turnout." I cheerfully remarked to a GMB veteran propping up the bar.
"You thought so?" He replied. "Hardly going to frighten the establishment."
"People, will realise," I assured him, "When the cuts start to bite they'll realise."
"It'll be too late by then." He replied.
His pessimism was a little disheartening as he regailed me with the time he lead a crowd at least twice the size into the very same City Hall and occupied it twenty years ago. We discussed France, where he'd just returned from, and the difference in attitudes there, how their country was founded on popular revolt, whereas ours, well...
"We missed out on the revolution." He remarked.
On the coach back to Leeds the heated political debate at the back had broken out into an argument. Same old sectarian bullshit the left have been arguing over for about 150 years. Say what you want about the right, at least they know how to do unity.
When I arrived home I checked the news for coverage of the days events and to see how the other rallies went. Edinburgh had 20,000 on the streets. Damn jocks putting us to shame, no wonder they love France so much...

EDIT And it's Liberals we're protesting against dumbass. Pay attention.
EDIT And it's Liberals we're protesting against dumbass. Pay attention.
Damn armchair warriors....
Damn armchair warriors....
[/quote]
shit in my mouth baby
shit in my mouth baby
[/quote]
Ok, i just realised it's nsfw filter doing that. Never mind...
Ok, i just realised it's nsfw filter doing that. Never mind...
Ok, i just realised it's nsfw filter doing that. Never mind...
[/quote]
well, i'll fix that, in time, i guess. next time let me know
Ok, i just realised it's nsfw filter doing that. Never mind...
well, i'll fix that, in time, i guess. next time let me know
[/quote]
I'll start saving up my pennies.
I'll start saving up my pennies.
;)
Say what you want about the right, at least they know how to do unity.
[/quote]
I'm glad you noticed. Some day soon you may realise that organised anarchy is a misnomer. In any case, kudos for getting out into the rain for some activism.
Out of curiosity Pabs and Digital, what do you two do? I am legitimately interested.
Say what you want about the right, at least they know how to do unity.
I'm glad you noticed. Some day soon you may realise that organised anarchy is a misnomer. In any case, kudos for getting out into the rain for some activism.
Out of curiosity Pabs and Digital, what do you two do? I am legitimately interested.
[/quote]
I see you've fallen for the classic misconception of Anarchism as favouring a chaotic, disorganised society. The idea that a non-hierarchical society can't be organised is nonsense. The anarcho-syndicalist unions resisting Franco during the Spanish civil war were both well organised and highly productive, as many outside observers (including those unsympathetic to their cause) attested.
Just ask this guy...
/____________
\
[quote user=synthesis]
Out of curiosity Pabs and Digital, what do you two do? I am legitimately interested.
[/quote]
I work for one of Britain's leading exploiters of tax loopholes and child labour.
I see you've fallen for the classic misconception of Anarchism as favouring a chaotic, disorganised society. The idea that a non-hierarchical society can't be organised is nonsense. The anarcho-syndicalist unions resisting Franco during the Spanish civil war were both well organised and highly productive, as many outside observers (including those unsympathetic to their cause) attested.
Just ask this guy...
/____________
\
Out of curiosity Pabs and Digital, what do you two do? I am legitimately interested.
I work for one of Britain's leading exploiters of tax loopholes and child labour.
The idea that a non-hierarchical society can't be organised is nonsense.
[/quote]
A non-hierarchical society might be organised, but it will never be effective. Human nature simply does not allow for such an organisation to survive. One of two things can happen to such a society.
1. It quickly changes from such a system. A strong leader emerges and creates a foundation of support. The non-heirarchical nature of ruling class would be unable to resist such a person due to there being no cohesion or unity in such a model.
2. It is conquered by an external heirarchical system.
Take your pick. Sure anarchists have always been cohesive when there is a common enemy, but that goes for any model. Take that enemy away and watch your 'non-heirarchal' factions tear themselves apart grubbing after power. You cannot escape human nature.
[quote user=pablo420]I work for one of Britain's leading exploiters of tax loopholes and child labour.
[/quote]
Excellent. Loving the self loathing pabs. Keep it up.
The idea that a non-hierarchical society can't be organised is nonsense.
A non-hierarchical society might be organised, but it will never be effective. Human nature simply does not allow for such an organisation to survive. One of two things can happen to such a society.
1. It quickly changes from such a system. A strong leader emerges and creates a foundation of support. The non-heirarchical nature of ruling class would be unable to resist such a person due to there being no cohesion or unity in such a model.
2. It is conquered by an external heirarchical system.
Take your pick. Sure anarchists have always been cohesive when there is a common enemy, but that goes for any model. Take that enemy away and watch your 'non-heirarchal' factions tear themselves apart grubbing after power. You cannot escape human nature.
Excellent. Loving the self loathing pabs. Keep it up.
Out of curiosity Pabs and Digital, what do you two do? I am legitimately interested.
[/quote]
I'm studying toward an MSc in Psychology.
Out of curiosity Pabs and Digital, what do you two do? I am legitimately interested.
I'm studying toward an MSc in Psychology.
You really love to fail, don't you.
[video]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u6XAPnuFjJc[/video]
[video]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l7AWnfFRc7g[/video]
You really love to fail, don't you.
where are thou captain hindsight?
where are thou captain hindsight?