[quote user=LithuanianLabourer] [quote user=proofinlife][quote user=DigitalAntichrist][quote user=pablo420][quote user=tuoni]And just like Wolffe she was a welfare queen.[/quote]
you do realise that rayn never advocated complete dissolution of the welfare state? She was an objectivist. Her primary message was that of promoting ability over need, and recognition that ability and action are a virtue while being in need is not. Ability and Action are creation and giving, while need is destruction and consumption. However, there is not a single person in the world that does not consume, or destroy. I am an objectivist, and I greatly admire Rand, but I would never suggest that people should not be afforded the protection of the state. It is a philosophy based on science, logic, and reality.
you do realise that rayn never advocated complete dissolution of the welfare state? She was an objectivist. Her primary message was that of promoting ability over need, and recognition that ability and action are a virtue while being in need is not. Ability and Action are creation and giving, while need is destruction and consumption. However, there is not a single person in the world that does not consume, or destroy. I am an objectivist, and I greatly admire Rand, but I would never suggest that people should not be afforded the protection of the state. It is a philosophy based on science, logic, and reality.
[quote user=synthesis] It is a philosophy based on science, logic, and reality. [/quote]
"The recipient of a public scholarship is morally justified only so long as he regards it as restitution and opposes all forms of welfare statism. Those who advocate public scholarships, have no right to them; those who oppose them, have."
Clearly...
synthesis wrote:
It is a philosophy based on science, logic, and reality.
"The recipient of a public scholarship is morally justified only so long as he regards it as restitution and opposes all forms of welfare statism. Those who advocate public scholarships, have no right to them; those who oppose them, have."
3
| 260 views | www.guardian.co.uk
[/quote]
[/quote]
[/quote]
[/quote]
[/quote]
[/quote]
[/quote]
[/quote]
[/quote]
[/quote]
[/quote]
[/quote]
"The recipient of a public scholarship is morally justified only so long as he regards it as restitution and opposes all forms of welfare statism. Those who advocate public scholarships, have no right to them; those who oppose them, have."
Clearly...
"The recipient of a public scholarship is morally justified only so long as he regards it as restitution and opposes all forms of welfare statism. Those who advocate public scholarships, have no right to them; those who oppose them, have."
Clearly...
btw, spammer, you're wasting your time, there's only 6 people on this site and we don't buy shit.
btw, spammer, you're wasting your time, there's only 6 people on this site and we don't buy shit.
btw, spammer, you're wasting your time, there's only 6 people on this site and we don't buy shit.
[/quote]
i dont een have a job
btw, spammer, you're wasting your time, there's only 6 people on this site and we don't buy shit.
i dont een have a job
[quote user=Wolffe]i dont een have a job [/quote]