15
| 124 views | www.telegraph.co.uk
Dr Rowan Williams acknowledged that the Church was still “scratching its head” about where it stands on issues like same-sex marriage despite its vocal public opposition to the Government’s plan to legalise it.
Scratching heads ?
What exactly do they do ? Do they have a research & legal departments, where they read the Holy Scripture, pray, meditate and discuss, brainstorming trying to get to the bottom of this, whether it is OK with God and Jaysus ?
No they don't. They just don't say anything in order not to lose the remains of their flock.
This is exactly a kind of faggotry you get when your religion doesn't have senile sclerotic old fart dictator, talking to God to decide these kinda questions.
Just like God intended, I might add !!!
Scratching heads ?
What exactly do they do ? Do they have a research & legal departments, where they read the Holy Scripture, pray, meditate and discuss, brainstorming trying to get to the bottom of this, whether it is OK with God and Jaysus ?
No they don't. They just don't say anything in order not to lose the remains of their flock.
This is exactly a kind of faggotry you get when your religion doesn't have senile sclerotic old fart dictator, talking to God to decide these kinda questions.
Just like God intended, I might add !!!
BUT there is all kinds of wrong with being forced to watch gay fornications on TV, created by jews and faggots in order to teach you that there is nothing wrong with being gay.
That's just WRONG !
BUT there is all kinds of wrong with being forced to watch gay fornications on TV, created by jews and faggots in order to teach you that there is nothing wrong with being gay.
That's just WRONG !
A belief which I (if forced to choose), would most strongly favor. And, which would (ahem) bar me from any 'Christian' church.
A belief which I (if forced to choose), would most strongly favor. And, which would (ahem) bar me from any 'Christian' church.
[/quote]
Real lessons? Principles? Everyone has outgrown those. Well, Talibans are still lagging behind but they will get there.
Real lessons? Principles? Everyone has outgrown those. Well, Talibans are still lagging behind but they will get there.
[/quote]
Too late..........Woolfee was blowing himself the whole time........
Too late..........Woolfee was blowing himself the whole time........
BUT there is all kinds of wrong with being forced to watch gay fornications on TV, created by jews and faggots in order to teach you that there is nothing wrong with being gay.
That's just WRONG !
[/quote]
agreed, there's too many jews and faggots in entertainment, spartacus was shit anyway so no big deal, but game of thrones?? come on!
we should send the jews and faggots to shitty places to improve them....
BUT there is all kinds of wrong with being forced to watch gay fornications on TV, created by jews and faggots in order to teach you that there is nothing wrong with being gay.
That's just WRONG !
agreed, there's too many jews and faggots in entertainment, spartacus was shit anyway so no big deal, but game of thrones?? come on!
we should send the jews and faggots to shitty places to improve them....
Here's what most historians believe (dominant since the 1800s):
Jesus was an apocalyptic Jew. He was a student of John the Baptist, who was far more famous and also believed the end of the world was near. We have many such people at this time, and Jesus seems to be no different than most others - throwing off society, arguing to abandon stuff and prepare for the end of the world. He had 12 "disciples", who believed they would rule the remaining world, each controlling one of the 12 original tribes of Israel.
Jesus mainly attracted poor, uneducated people. He wasn't a strict adherent or expert in Jewish law, but rather just taught with stories that would appeal to the lower classes of Roman society. After Jesus died, these people generally believed Jesus was immortal, and was literally roaming the Earth, preparing for the coming end. Early Gospels and Christians seem to believe Jesus had become immortal, and they too might be able to do the same (calling him "The First of Us").
Romans had a history of regularly killing such people, to keep order.
The next most popular view emerged in the 1950s in North America:
Jesus was a moral teacher, who wasn't head of anything. Christians were just a group of people who focused on moral views, and wrote down a few stories. Many were later attributed to a single person, Jesus. John the Baptist's followers later joined this group, and added all the Apocalypse stuff to the Gospels.
Such historians focus on the "lost Gospels", believing that the early Christians had many more varied beliefs but were destroyed by Paul's church. There may have been a "split" when Jesus died, with Jesus' close family teaching the moral view, and Paul going off like Harold Camping, sure the world was ending.
Homosexuality
Jesus never said anything about the subject - we get this stuff from Paul, who was trying to establish his own church with his own rules, because he was always fighting with other Christians & Jews. I don't really care much for Paul as a teacher, since his morality seems to be quite poor, and his thinking unstable.
Paul didn't know Jesus and seemed to know nothing of his life. He was also interested in banning women from teaching or speaking in church (because, Adam and Eve showed women are inferior). He believed you shouldn't get married or ever have sex. He thought slavery was a great institution, that represented the manifestation of God's relationship with people. He was just a man of his time.
Here's what most historians believe (dominant since the 1800s):
Jesus was an apocalyptic Jew. He was a student of John the Baptist, who was far more famous and also believed the end of the world was near. We have many such people at this time, and Jesus seems to be no different than most others - throwing off society, arguing to abandon stuff and prepare for the end of the world. He had 12 "disciples", who believed they would rule the remaining world, each controlling one of the 12 original tribes of Israel.
Jesus mainly attracted poor, uneducated people. He wasn't a strict adherent or expert in Jewish law, but rather just taught with stories that would appeal to the lower classes of Roman society. After Jesus died, these people generally believed Jesus was immortal, and was literally roaming the Earth, preparing for the coming end. Early Gospels and Christians seem to believe Jesus had become immortal, and they too might be able to do the same (calling him "The First of Us").
Romans had a history of regularly killing such people, to keep order.
The next most popular view emerged in the 1950s in North America:
Jesus was a moral teacher, who wasn't head of anything. Christians were just a group of people who focused on moral views, and wrote down a few stories. Many were later attributed to a single person, Jesus. John the Baptist's followers later joined this group, and added all the Apocalypse stuff to the Gospels.
Such historians focus on the "lost Gospels", believing that the early Christians had many more varied beliefs but were destroyed by Paul's church. There may have been a "split" when Jesus died, with Jesus' close family teaching the moral view, and Paul going off like Harold Camping, sure the world was ending.
Homosexuality
Jesus never said anything about the subject - we get this stuff from Paul, who was trying to establish his own church with his own rules, because he was always fighting with other Christians & Jews. I don't really care much for Paul as a teacher, since his morality seems to be quite poor, and his thinking unstable.
Paul didn't know Jesus and seemed to know nothing of his life. He was also interested in banning women from teaching or speaking in church (because, Adam and Eve showed women are inferior). He believed you shouldn't get married or ever have sex. He thought slavery was a great institution, that represented the manifestation of God's relationship with people. He was just a man of his time.
You could base laws on reason. Romantic relationships require consent from all parties. Children, dead people, and animals do not have the capacity to consent.
You could base laws on reason. Romantic relationships require consent from all parties. Children, dead people, and animals do not have the capacity to consent.