What is fail is simply using what is politically expedient for you instead of being not only honest with yourself, but honest with the people you are supposed to represent. All this is about, really, is more proof that Barack Hussein Obama is nothing more than a narcissistic, lying, steaming bag of crap who will only tell people what he THINKS they want to hear......SHOCKER!!!!!!
Fido wrote:
muster up the troops, the gay vote is nothing to sneeze at. The republicans aren't going to get it.
Plus it's a deficit beater. Wait til they find out a same sex marriage license costs a trillion dollars.
That's some sweet Hegelian Dialectic being woven there Reverend......
What is fail is simply using what is politically expedient for you instead of being not only honest with yourself, but honest with the people you are supposed to represent. All this is about, really, is more proof that Barack Hussein Obama is nothing more than a narcissistic, lying, steaming bag of crap who will only tell people what he THINKS they want to hear......SHOCKER!!!!!!
What is fail is simply using what is politically expedient for you instead of being not only honest with yourself, but honest with the people you are supposed to represent. All this is about, really, is more proof that Barack Hussein Obama is nothing more than a narcissistic, lying, steaming bag of crap who will only tell people what he THINKS they want to hear......SHOCKER!!!!!! [/quote]
That in effect is the first rule in politics ^ The more things change the more thay stay the same, Quintas Cicero
ShanusMaximus wrote:
What is fail is simply using what is politically expedient for you instead of being not only honest with yourself, but honest with the people you are supposed to represent. All this is about, really, is more proof that Barack Hussein Obama is nothing more than a narcissistic, lying, steaming bag of crap who will only tell people what he THINKS they want to hear......SHOCKER!!!!!!
That in effect is the first rule in politics ^ The more things change the more thay stay the same, Quintas Cicero
Obama already opened the military to gays and refused to enforce the "Defense of Marriage Act", effectively removing any Federal obstacles to gay marriage... which is basically the policy he has always claimed to have and all the President can really do. The fact that he has shifted to a"personal belief" in marriage over civil rights doesn't make any practical difference.
[quote user=ShanusMaximus]Obama is nothing more than a narcissistic, lying, steaming bag of crap who will only tell people what he THINKS they want to hear......SHOCKER!!!!!![/quote]
You should take your cynicism and apply it in a more useful way. This just looks like some ranting you'd hear on Talk-Radio, over a minor thing we demand of every President in order to get elected.
Here's how I'd do it:
Biden pre-empted the President? This suggests he's having a bit of a split... sounds like he's considering a run for 2016, and took this opportunity away from Obama. After all, this will be a much better position in 2016.
But wasn't Hillary the likely candidate? No, I think she recently announced that she wants to retire. Didn't Biden recently change his Press Secretary and Comm Director around that same time? hmmm...
In fact, this must mean the VP has his own polls in the field, and must be looking at his own perception under cover of the President's re-election. Now Biden knows he's been working behind the scenes too much and needs to emphasize some popular disagreements, such as support for same-sex marriage or disagreements over Afghanistan.
He must also have learned he is old. He's going to be telling us every time he jogs or plays golf now.
Okay, it wasn't that useful. But it gives me things to look for and things to expect.
I think virtually nothing has changed.
Obama already opened the military to gays and refused to enforce the "Defense of Marriage Act", effectively removing any Federal obstacles to gay marriage... which is basically the policy he has always claimed to have and all the President can really do. The fact that he has shifted to a"personal belief" in marriage over civil rights doesn't make any practical difference.
ShanusMaximus wrote:
Obama is nothing more than a narcissistic, lying, steaming bag of crap who will only tell people what he THINKS they want to hear......SHOCKER!!!!!!
You should take your cynicism and apply it in a more useful way. This just looks like some ranting you'd hear on Talk-Radio, over a minor thing we demand of every President in order to get elected.
Here's how I'd do it:
Biden pre-empted the President? This suggests he's having a bit of a split... sounds like he's considering a run for 2016, and took this opportunity away from Obama. After all, this will be a much better position in 2016.
But wasn't Hillary the likely candidate? No, I think she recently announced that she wants to retire. Didn't Biden recently change his Press Secretary and Comm Director around that same time? hmmm...
In fact, this must mean the VP has his own polls in the field, and must be looking at his own perception under cover of the President's re-election. Now Biden knows he's been working behind the scenes too much and needs to emphasize some popular disagreements, such as support for same-sex marriage or disagreements over Afghanistan.
He must also have learned he is old. He's going to be telling us every time he jogs or plays golf now.
Okay, it wasn't that useful. But it gives me things to look for and things to expect.
[quote user=EricManning] I think virtually nothing has changed.
The fact that he has shifted to a"personal belief" in marriage over civil rights doesn't make any practical difference.
[/quote]
i was gonna say this but it's just a wedge issue and i don't think it's worth the attention paid.
[quote user=EricManning] Biden pre-empted the President? This suggests he's having a bit of a split... sounds like he's considering a run for 2016, and took this opportunity away from Obama. After all, this will be a much better position in 2016.
But wasn't Hillary the likely candidate? No, I think she recently announced that she wants to retire. Didn't Biden recently change his Press Secretary and Comm Director around that same time? hmmm...
In fact, this must mean the VP has his own polls in the field, and must be looking at his own perception under cover of the President's re-election. Now Biden knows he's been working behind the scenes too much and needs to emphasize some popular disagreements, such as support for same-sex marriage or disagreements over Afghanistan.
He must also have learned he is old. He's going to be telling us every time he jogs or plays golf now.
[/quote]
interesting. i can't see the republicans doing much in the next generation, their base is dying of old age, or turnng away from religious conservativism. there just aren't enough rich people to carry them by themselves.
EricManning wrote:
I think virtually nothing has changed.
The fact that he has shifted to a"personal belief" in marriage over civil rights doesn't make any practical difference.
i was gonna say this but it's just a wedge issue and i don't think it's worth the attention paid.
EricManning wrote:
Biden pre-empted the President? This suggests he's having a bit of a split... sounds like he's considering a run for 2016, and took this opportunity away from Obama. After all, this will be a much better position in 2016.
But wasn't Hillary the likely candidate? No, I think she recently announced that she wants to retire. Didn't Biden recently change his Press Secretary and Comm Director around that same time? hmmm...
In fact, this must mean the VP has his own polls in the field, and must be looking at his own perception under cover of the President's re-election. Now Biden knows he's been working behind the scenes too much and needs to emphasize some popular disagreements, such as support for same-sex marriage or disagreements over Afghanistan.
He must also have learned he is old. He's going to be telling us every time he jogs or plays golf now.
interesting. i can't see the republicans doing much in the next generation, their base is dying of old age, or turnng away from religious conservativism. there just aren't enough rich people to carry them by themselves.
"You should take your cynicism and apply it in a more useful way. This just looks like some ranting you'd hear on Talk-Radio, over a minor thing we demand of every President in order to get elected."
"The fact that he has shifted to a"personal belief" in marriage over civil rights doesn't make any practical difference."
So why didn't he tell everybody last year? Oh, because it DOES make a difference......I just think this poor bastard is getting the difference he didn't want. Whether you like it or not, most people think this was done for political expediency instead of what he actually thinks is right.
@Manning
"You should take your cynicism and apply it in a more useful way. This just looks like some ranting you'd hear on Talk-Radio, over a minor thing we demand of every President in order to get elected."
"The fact that he has shifted to a"personal belief" in marriage over civil rights doesn't make any practical difference."
So why didn't he tell everybody last year? Oh, because it DOES make a difference......I just think this poor bastard is getting the difference he didn't want. Whether you like it or not, most people think this was done for political expediency instead of what he actually thinks is right.
According to Obama's public statements, he always believed in legal equality, but not religious recognition (although he often said he might change his mind). In 1996, Civil Unions didn't yet exist, so he says marriage was the closest choice he was given. Now, he says more recent experiences have convinced him this "separate but equal" thing is really not good enough.
I don't know if his story is true, but I doubt any President in the last 20 years has had a serious objection to gay marriage. For 200 years, most Presidents have probably been atheist. I bet most serious Republican candidates also believe in evolution and global warming. We expect every candidate to change their "personal beliefs" to represent their constituency.
I just felt the heavy political bent might make people completely dismiss your point. Everyone knows this sort of thing is common and expected (adopting the views of voters), so I have a hard time taking such hyperbolic criticisms seriously... Nor do I expect candidates to ever oppose farm subsidies during the Iowa Caucasus, or open ties to Cuba while campaigning in Florida.
According to Obama's public statements, he always believed in legal equality, but not religious recognition (although he often said he might change his mind). In 1996, Civil Unions didn't yet exist, so he says marriage was the closest choice he was given. Now, he says more recent experiences have convinced him this "separate but equal" thing is really not good enough.
I don't know if his story is true, but I doubt any President in the last 20 years has had a serious objection to gay marriage. For 200 years, most Presidents have probably been atheist. I bet most serious Republican candidates also believe in evolution and global warming. We expect every candidate to change their "personal beliefs" to represent their constituency.
I just felt the heavy political bent might make people completely dismiss your point. Everyone knows this sort of thing is common and expected (adopting the views of voters), so I have a hard time taking such hyperbolic criticisms seriously... Nor do I expect candidates to ever oppose farm subsidies during the Iowa Caucasus, or open ties to Cuba while campaigning in Florida.
[quote user=EricManning] According to Obama's public statements, he always believed in legal equality, but not religious recognition (although he often said he might change his mind). In 1996, Civil Unions didn't yet exist, so he says marriage was the closest choice he was given. Now, he says more recent experiences have convinced him this "separate but equal" thing is really not good enough.
I don't know if his story is true, but I doubt any President in the last 20 years has had a serious objection to gay marriage. For 200 years, most Presidents have probably been atheist. I bet most serious Republican candidates also believe in evolution and global warming. We expect every candidate to change their "personal beliefs" to represent their constituency.
I just felt the heavy political bent might make people completely dismiss your point. Everyone knows this sort of thing is common and expected (adopting the views of voters), so I have a hard time taking such hyperbolic criticisms seriously... Nor do I expect candidates to ever oppose farm subsidies during the Iowa Caucasus, or open ties to Cuba while campaigning in Florida. [/quote]
You sir.........are an excellent gymnast........and largely clueless about regular people.
EricManning wrote:
According to Obama's public statements, he always believed in legal equality, but not religious recognition (although he often said he might change his mind). In 1996, Civil Unions didn't yet exist, so he says marriage was the closest choice he was given. Now, he says more recent experiences have convinced him this "separate but equal" thing is really not good enough.
I don't know if his story is true, but I doubt any President in the last 20 years has had a serious objection to gay marriage. For 200 years, most Presidents have probably been atheist. I bet most serious Republican candidates also believe in evolution and global warming. We expect every candidate to change their "personal beliefs" to represent their constituency.
I just felt the heavy political bent might make people completely dismiss your point. Everyone knows this sort of thing is common and expected (adopting the views of voters), so I have a hard time taking such hyperbolic criticisms seriously... Nor do I expect candidates to ever oppose farm subsidies during the Iowa Caucasus, or open ties to Cuba while campaigning in Florida.
You sir.........are an excellent gymnast........and largely clueless about regular people.
[quote user=Wolffe] [quote user=sailirish7]...said the Canadian, without a hint of Irony....[/quote]
nice one, did you think of that all by yourself? You must be some kind of super tough guy or something. In other words- get fucked. [/quote]
Cry more, Or leave the Internets forever again. That was entertaining for about 5 minutes.
You do realize that you are our little organ grinder monkey here right? You come on and say asinine things, we laugh and mock you, and the whole thing rinses and repeats ad nauseum. Your butthurt about it all just makes it all the more hilarious...
Wolffe wrote:
sailirish7 wrote:
...said the Canadian, without a hint of Irony....
nice one, did you think of that all by yourself? You must be some kind of super tough guy or something. In other words- get fucked.
Cry more, Or leave the Internets forever again. That was entertaining for about 5 minutes.
You do realize that you are our little organ grinder monkey here right? You come on and say asinine things, we laugh and mock you, and the whole thing rinses and repeats ad nauseum. Your butthurt about it all just makes it all the more hilarious...
14
| 283 views
| 400x246
| 28KB
Also, I just hope that it sincerely affects idiot fat fucking redneck yanks. I am thinking the logic in their heads might have to go like this:
"If mitt romney is a mormon faggot who sucks... and Obama is the lesser of 2 evils, and he supports gay marriage, maybe I should too."
Also, I just hope that it sincerely affects idiot fat fucking redneck yanks. I am thinking the logic in their heads might have to go like this:
"If mitt romney is a mormon faggot who sucks... and Obama is the lesser of 2 evils, and he supports gay marriage, maybe I should too."
muster up the troops, the gay vote is nothing to sneeze at. The republicans aren't going to get it.
Plus it's a deficit beater. Wait til they find out a same sex marriage license costs a trillion dollars.
muster up the troops, the gay vote is nothing to sneeze at. The republicans aren't going to get it.
Plus it's a deficit beater. Wait til they find out a same sex marriage license costs a trillion dollars.
[/quote]
...said the Canadian, without a hint of Irony....
...said the Canadian, without a hint of Irony....
muster up the troops, the gay vote is nothing to sneeze at. The republicans aren't going to get it.
Plus it's a deficit beater. Wait til they find out a same sex marriage license costs a trillion dollars.
[/quote]
That's some sweet Hegelian Dialectic being woven there Reverend......
All Obama stated was already the fucking obvious. It is up to the States. Well no shit sherlock. He is so full of shit anyway. In 96' he said he fully supported gay marriage.
In 1996, as a state senate candidate, Obama wrote and signed a survey declaring: “I favor legalizing same sex marriages, and would fight efforts to prohibit such marriages.
Suddenly....he changes....he wants civil unions.....
"Well, I think that marriage has a religious connotation in this society, in our culture, that makes it very difficult to disentangle from the civil aspects of marriage. And as a consequence, it would be extraordinarily difficult and a distraction to try to build a consensus around marriage for gays and lesbians. What we can do is form civil union that provide all the civil rights that marriage entails to same-sex couples. And that is something that I have consistently been in favor of. And I think that the vast majority of Americans don't want to see gay and lesbian couples discriminated against when it comes to hospital visitation and so on." - Obama
What is fail is simply using what is politically expedient for you instead of being not only honest with yourself, but honest with the people you are supposed to represent. All this is about, really, is more proof that Barack Hussein Obama is nothing more than a narcissistic, lying, steaming bag of crap who will only tell people what he THINKS they want to hear......SHOCKER!!!!!!
muster up the troops, the gay vote is nothing to sneeze at. The republicans aren't going to get it.
Plus it's a deficit beater. Wait til they find out a same sex marriage license costs a trillion dollars.
That's some sweet Hegelian Dialectic being woven there Reverend......
All Obama stated was already the fucking obvious. It is up to the States. Well no shit sherlock. He is so full of shit anyway. In 96' he said he fully supported gay marriage.
In 1996, as a state senate candidate, Obama wrote and signed a survey declaring: “I favor legalizing same sex marriages, and would fight efforts to prohibit such marriages.
Suddenly....he changes....he wants civil unions.....
"Well, I think that marriage has a religious connotation in this society, in our culture, that makes it very difficult to disentangle from the civil aspects of marriage. And as a consequence, it would be extraordinarily difficult and a distraction to try to build a consensus around marriage for gays and lesbians. What we can do is form civil union that provide all the civil rights that marriage entails to same-sex couples. And that is something that I have consistently been in favor of. And I think that the vast majority of Americans don't want to see gay and lesbian couples discriminated against when it comes to hospital visitation and so on." - Obama
What is fail is simply using what is politically expedient for you instead of being not only honest with yourself, but honest with the people you are supposed to represent. All this is about, really, is more proof that Barack Hussein Obama is nothing more than a narcissistic, lying, steaming bag of crap who will only tell people what he THINKS they want to hear......SHOCKER!!!!!!
...said the Canadian, without a hint of Irony....
[/quote]
nice one, did you think of that all by yourself? You must be some kind of super tough guy or something. In other words- get fucked.
...said the Canadian, without a hint of Irony....
nice one, did you think of that all by yourself? You must be some kind of super tough guy or something. In other words- get fucked.
What is fail is simply using what is politically expedient for you instead of being not only honest with yourself, but honest with the people you are supposed to represent. All this is about, really, is more proof that Barack Hussein Obama is nothing more than a narcissistic, lying, steaming bag of crap who will only tell people what he THINKS they want to hear......SHOCKER!!!!!!
[/quote]
That in effect is the first rule in politics ^
The more things change the more thay stay the same, Quintas Cicero
What is fail is simply using what is politically expedient for you instead of being not only honest with yourself, but honest with the people you are supposed to represent. All this is about, really, is more proof that Barack Hussein Obama is nothing more than a narcissistic, lying, steaming bag of crap who will only tell people what he THINKS they want to hear......SHOCKER!!!!!!
That in effect is the first rule in politics ^
The more things change the more thay stay the same, Quintas Cicero
Obama already opened the military to gays and refused to enforce the "Defense of Marriage Act", effectively removing any Federal obstacles to gay marriage... which is basically the policy he has always claimed to have and all the President can really do. The fact that he has shifted to a"personal belief" in marriage over civil rights doesn't make any practical difference.
[quote user=ShanusMaximus]Obama is nothing more than a narcissistic, lying, steaming bag of crap who will only tell people what he THINKS they want to hear......SHOCKER!!!!!![/quote]
You should take your cynicism and apply it in a more useful way. This just looks like some ranting you'd hear on Talk-Radio, over a minor thing we demand of every President in order to get elected.
Here's how I'd do it:
Biden pre-empted the President? This suggests he's having a bit of a split... sounds like he's considering a run for 2016, and took this opportunity away from Obama. After all, this will be a much better position in 2016.
But wasn't Hillary the likely candidate? No, I think she recently announced that she wants to retire. Didn't Biden recently change his Press Secretary and Comm Director around that same time? hmmm...
In fact, this must mean the VP has his own polls in the field, and must be looking at his own perception under cover of the President's re-election. Now Biden knows he's been working behind the scenes too much and needs to emphasize some popular disagreements, such as support for same-sex marriage or disagreements over Afghanistan.
He must also have learned he is old. He's going to be telling us every time he jogs or plays golf now.
Okay, it wasn't that useful. But it gives me things to look for and things to expect.
Obama already opened the military to gays and refused to enforce the "Defense of Marriage Act", effectively removing any Federal obstacles to gay marriage... which is basically the policy he has always claimed to have and all the President can really do. The fact that he has shifted to a"personal belief" in marriage over civil rights doesn't make any practical difference.
You should take your cynicism and apply it in a more useful way. This just looks like some ranting you'd hear on Talk-Radio, over a minor thing we demand of every President in order to get elected.
Here's how I'd do it:
Biden pre-empted the President? This suggests he's having a bit of a split... sounds like he's considering a run for 2016, and took this opportunity away from Obama. After all, this will be a much better position in 2016.
But wasn't Hillary the likely candidate? No, I think she recently announced that she wants to retire. Didn't Biden recently change his Press Secretary and Comm Director around that same time? hmmm...
In fact, this must mean the VP has his own polls in the field, and must be looking at his own perception under cover of the President's re-election. Now Biden knows he's been working behind the scenes too much and needs to emphasize some popular disagreements, such as support for same-sex marriage or disagreements over Afghanistan.
He must also have learned he is old. He's going to be telling us every time he jogs or plays golf now.
Okay, it wasn't that useful. But it gives me things to look for and things to expect.
The fact that he has shifted to a"personal belief" in marriage over civil rights doesn't make any practical difference.
[/quote]
i was gonna say this but it's just a wedge issue and i don't think it's worth the attention paid.
[quote user=EricManning]
Biden pre-empted the President? This suggests he's having a bit of a split... sounds like he's considering a run for 2016, and took this opportunity away from Obama. After all, this will be a much better position in 2016.
But wasn't Hillary the likely candidate? No, I think she recently announced that she wants to retire. Didn't Biden recently change his Press Secretary and Comm Director around that same time? hmmm...
In fact, this must mean the VP has his own polls in the field, and must be looking at his own perception under cover of the President's re-election. Now Biden knows he's been working behind the scenes too much and needs to emphasize some popular disagreements, such as support for same-sex marriage or disagreements over Afghanistan.
He must also have learned he is old. He's going to be telling us every time he jogs or plays golf now.
[/quote]
interesting. i can't see the republicans doing much in the next generation, their base is dying of old age, or turnng away from religious conservativism. there just aren't enough rich people to carry them by themselves.
The fact that he has shifted to a"personal belief" in marriage over civil rights doesn't make any practical difference.
i was gonna say this but it's just a wedge issue and i don't think it's worth the attention paid.
Biden pre-empted the President? This suggests he's having a bit of a split... sounds like he's considering a run for 2016, and took this opportunity away from Obama. After all, this will be a much better position in 2016.
But wasn't Hillary the likely candidate? No, I think she recently announced that she wants to retire. Didn't Biden recently change his Press Secretary and Comm Director around that same time? hmmm...
In fact, this must mean the VP has his own polls in the field, and must be looking at his own perception under cover of the President's re-election. Now Biden knows he's been working behind the scenes too much and needs to emphasize some popular disagreements, such as support for same-sex marriage or disagreements over Afghanistan.
He must also have learned he is old. He's going to be telling us every time he jogs or plays golf now.
interesting. i can't see the republicans doing much in the next generation, their base is dying of old age, or turnng away from religious conservativism. there just aren't enough rich people to carry them by themselves.
"You should take your cynicism and apply it in a more useful way. This just looks like some ranting you'd hear on Talk-Radio, over a minor thing we demand of every President in order to get elected."
He speaks of his evolution. Does evolution mean you start fully evolved, then devolve, then evolve again? Or is that simply something you do for political expediency? It isn't the first time he has done shit like this.....people are seeing a pattern. He is a liar of epic proportions.......
He had written on the 1996 questionnaire, "I favor legalizing same-sex marriages, and would fight efforts to prohibit such marriages."
Just two years later, on another Outlines questionnaire, Obama wasn’t so sure. Did he favor legalizing same-sex marriage? "Undecided." Would he support a bill to repeal Illinois legislation prohibiting same-sex marriage? "Undecided." Would he co-sponsor it? "Undecided."
In November 2008, he said much the same thing to a rather different audience: MTV.
"I believe marriage is between a man and a woman. I am not in favor of gay marriage."
"The fact that he has shifted to a"personal belief" in marriage over civil rights doesn't make any practical difference."
So why didn't he tell everybody last year? Oh, because it DOES make a difference......I just think this poor bastard is getting the difference he didn't want. Whether you like it or not, most people think this was done for political expediency instead of what he actually thinks is right.
"You should take your cynicism and apply it in a more useful way. This just looks like some ranting you'd hear on Talk-Radio, over a minor thing we demand of every President in order to get elected."
He speaks of his evolution. Does evolution mean you start fully evolved, then devolve, then evolve again? Or is that simply something you do for political expediency? It isn't the first time he has done shit like this.....people are seeing a pattern. He is a liar of epic proportions.......
He had written on the 1996 questionnaire, "I favor legalizing same-sex marriages, and would fight efforts to prohibit such marriages."
Just two years later, on another Outlines questionnaire, Obama wasn’t so sure. Did he favor legalizing same-sex marriage? "Undecided." Would he support a bill to repeal Illinois legislation prohibiting same-sex marriage? "Undecided." Would he co-sponsor it? "Undecided."
In November 2008, he said much the same thing to a rather different audience: MTV.
"I believe marriage is between a man and a woman. I am not in favor of gay marriage."
"The fact that he has shifted to a"personal belief" in marriage over civil rights doesn't make any practical difference."
So why didn't he tell everybody last year? Oh, because it DOES make a difference......I just think this poor bastard is getting the difference he didn't want. Whether you like it or not, most people think this was done for political expediency instead of what he actually thinks is right.
I don't know if his story is true, but I doubt any President in the last 20 years has had a serious objection to gay marriage. For 200 years, most Presidents have probably been atheist. I bet most serious Republican candidates also believe in evolution and global warming. We expect every candidate to change their "personal beliefs" to represent their constituency.
I just felt the heavy political bent might make people completely dismiss your point. Everyone knows this sort of thing is common and expected (adopting the views of voters), so I have a hard time taking such hyperbolic criticisms seriously... Nor do I expect candidates to ever oppose farm subsidies during the Iowa Caucasus, or open ties to Cuba while campaigning in Florida.
I don't know if his story is true, but I doubt any President in the last 20 years has had a serious objection to gay marriage. For 200 years, most Presidents have probably been atheist. I bet most serious Republican candidates also believe in evolution and global warming. We expect every candidate to change their "personal beliefs" to represent their constituency.
I just felt the heavy political bent might make people completely dismiss your point. Everyone knows this sort of thing is common and expected (adopting the views of voters), so I have a hard time taking such hyperbolic criticisms seriously... Nor do I expect candidates to ever oppose farm subsidies during the Iowa Caucasus, or open ties to Cuba while campaigning in Florida.
I don't know if his story is true, but I doubt any President in the last 20 years has had a serious objection to gay marriage. For 200 years, most Presidents have probably been atheist. I bet most serious Republican candidates also believe in evolution and global warming. We expect every candidate to change their "personal beliefs" to represent their constituency.
I just felt the heavy political bent might make people completely dismiss your point. Everyone knows this sort of thing is common and expected (adopting the views of voters), so I have a hard time taking such hyperbolic criticisms seriously... Nor do I expect candidates to ever oppose farm subsidies during the Iowa Caucasus, or open ties to Cuba while campaigning in Florida.
[/quote]
You sir.........are an excellent gymnast........and largely clueless about regular people.
I don't know if his story is true, but I doubt any President in the last 20 years has had a serious objection to gay marriage. For 200 years, most Presidents have probably been atheist. I bet most serious Republican candidates also believe in evolution and global warming. We expect every candidate to change their "personal beliefs" to represent their constituency.
I just felt the heavy political bent might make people completely dismiss your point. Everyone knows this sort of thing is common and expected (adopting the views of voters), so I have a hard time taking such hyperbolic criticisms seriously... Nor do I expect candidates to ever oppose farm subsidies during the Iowa Caucasus, or open ties to Cuba while campaigning in Florida.
You sir.........are an excellent gymnast........and largely clueless about regular people.
nice one, did you think of that all by yourself? You must be some kind of super tough guy or something. In other words- get fucked.
[/quote]
Cry more, Or leave the Internets forever again. That was entertaining for about 5 minutes.
You do realize that you are our little organ grinder monkey here right? You come on and say asinine things, we laugh and mock you, and the whole thing rinses and repeats ad nauseum. Your butthurt about it all just makes it all the more hilarious...
nice one, did you think of that all by yourself? You must be some kind of super tough guy or something. In other words- get fucked.
Cry more, Or leave the Internets forever again. That was entertaining for about 5 minutes.
You do realize that you are our little organ grinder monkey here right? You come on and say asinine things, we laugh and mock you, and the whole thing rinses and repeats ad nauseum. Your butthurt about it all just makes it all the more hilarious...