75
| 247 views | www.youtube.com
Editor's Note: We have obtained hundreds of documents from the 1966 meeting. This is a Wikileaks-sized data dump and we will be writing several more articles over the next few days to cover the myriad of different issues at hand.
good job, 46 years but we finally have a handle on this bilderberg thing.
good job, 46 years but we finally have a handle on this bilderberg thing.
good job, 46 years but we finally have a handle on this bilderberg thing.
[/quote]
Except that we dont....
good job, 46 years but we finally have a handle on this bilderberg thing.
Except that we dont....
good job, 46 years but we finally have a handle on this bilderberg thing.
[/quote]Except that we dont....
[/quote]
I thought the face palming sarcasm would be more obvious.
good job, 46 years but we finally have a handle on this bilderberg thing.
Except that we dont....
I thought the face palming sarcasm would be more obvious.
I'm glad elites were working on it even back at 1966.
Gold star medal for every bilderberger.
otester, Wolffe, I want you to know that I despise you. Humanity is about to colonize Mars and you are still hanging to your "not-in-my-backyard" bullshit.
I'm glad elites were working on it even back at 1966.
Gold star medal for every bilderberger.
otester, Wolffe, I want you to know that I despise you. Humanity is about to colonize Mars and you are still hanging to your "not-in-my-backyard" bullshit.
I'm glad elites were working on it even back at 1966.
Gold star medal for every bilderberger.
otester, Wolffe, I want you to know that I and every sensible person with intellect above average despise you. We are about to colonize Mars and you are still hanging to your "not-in-my-backyard" bullshit.
[/quote]
Your point is well taken, however, we're not as close to col,onizing Mars as you think. We need to get nearer to FTL travel to make it worthwhile. Notice I said NEAR, I don't think mankind will master FTl within the next 100 years (or perhaps even in our childrens lifetime)
I'm glad elites were working on it even back at 1966.
Gold star medal for every bilderberger.
otester, Wolffe, I want you to know that I and every sensible person with intellect above average despise you. We are about to colonize Mars and you are still hanging to your "not-in-my-backyard" bullshit.
Your point is well taken, however, we're not as close to col,onizing Mars as you think. We need to get nearer to FTL travel to make it worthwhile. Notice I said NEAR, I don't think mankind will master FTl within the next 100 years (or perhaps even in our childrens lifetime)
Your point is well taken, however, we're not as close to col,onizing Mars as you think. We need to get nearer to FTL travel to make it worthwhile. Notice I said NEAR, I don't think mankind will master FTl within the next 100 years (or perhaps even in our childrens lifetime)
[/quote]
Yeaaaah, it took us 150 years just to get theorized atomic energy working. How does one expect us to generate the power required to move faster than light, faster than gravity can tug, AND keep a spec of dust from making a block of swiss cheese out of said vehicle? Are you saying by then we'll have functional high power energy shields and cool lasers that don't just make fire on dry grass?
Your point is well taken, however, we're not as close to col,onizing Mars as you think. We need to get nearer to FTL travel to make it worthwhile. Notice I said NEAR, I don't think mankind will master FTl within the next 100 years (or perhaps even in our childrens lifetime)
Yeaaaah, it took us 150 years just to get theorized atomic energy working. How does one expect us to generate the power required to move faster than light, faster than gravity can tug, AND keep a spec of dust from making a block of swiss cheese out of said vehicle? Are you saying by then we'll have functional high power energy shields and cool lasers that don't just make fire on dry grass?
Yeaaaah, it took us 150 years just to get theorized atomic energy working. How does one expect us to generate the power required to move faster than light, faster than gravity can tug, AND keep a spec of dust from making a block of swiss cheese out of said vehicle? Are you saying by then we'll have functional high power energy shields and cool lasers that don't just make fire on dry grass?
[/quote]
Technology advances exponentially, not linearly first off. Secondly, If we are able to make the breakthroughs necessary to make a return trip possible in a few years time instead of several decades, I am pretty sure we would have some sort of energy shield and artificial gravity to protect the vessel and the passengers.
Yeaaaah, it took us 150 years just to get theorized atomic energy working. How does one expect us to generate the power required to move faster than light, faster than gravity can tug, AND keep a spec of dust from making a block of swiss cheese out of said vehicle? Are you saying by then we'll have functional high power energy shields and cool lasers that don't just make fire on dry grass?
Technology advances exponentially, not linearly first off. Secondly, If we are able to make the breakthroughs necessary to make a return trip possible in a few years time instead of several decades, I am pretty sure we would have some sort of energy shield and artificial gravity to protect the vessel and the passengers.
So if we have space station orbiting Earth and space station orbiting Mars and if we have some "lift" type contraption to get to orbital station easilly, we could transport frozen people (oh yeah, we need that developed too) between two stations quite cheap, considering that there is no need for applied force to move spacecraft in space as long as it's not near to any large mass.
In the future they will be shooting colonist spacebuses to Mars using some kind of orbital sling.
So if we have space station orbiting Earth and space station orbiting Mars and if we have some "lift" type contraption to get to orbital station easilly, we could transport frozen people (oh yeah, we need that developed too) between two stations quite cheap, considering that there is no need for applied force to move spacecraft in space as long as it's not near to any large mass.
In the future they will be shooting colonist spacebuses to Mars using some kind of orbital sling.
But robots would be most useful to build shit on Mars and terraform it, those things don't care about G's, water or oxygen, they could be shot at Mars from the orbit of the Earth along with initial building materials.
But robots would be most useful to build shit on Mars and terraform it, those things don't care about G's, water or oxygen, they could be shot at Mars from the orbit of the Earth along with initial building materials.
But robots would be most useful to build shit on Mars and terraform it, those things don't care about G's, water or oxygen, they could be shot at Mars from the orbit of the Earth along with initial building materials.
[/quote]
lol......I can't help but think that the android population of mars will thrive and expand after earth destroys itself. One has to wonder about their archeological surveys of earth several hundred years later....
But robots would be most useful to build shit on Mars and terraform it, those things don't care about G's, water or oxygen, they could be shot at Mars from the orbit of the Earth along with initial building materials.
lol......I can't help but think that the android population of mars will thrive and expand after earth destroys itself. One has to wonder about their archeological surveys of earth several hundred years later....
So if we have space station orbiting Earth and space station orbiting Mars and if we have some "lift" type contraption to get to orbital station easilly, we could transport frozen people (oh yeah, we need that developed too) between two stations quite cheap, considering that there is no need for applied force to move spacecraft in space as long as it's not near to any large mass.
In the future they will be shooting colonist spacebuses to Mars using some kind of orbital sling.
[/quote]
400 km elevator - check, Liquid Oxygen - check, 400 foot slingshot - check and maybe a map if you get knocked off your trajectory by an asteroid or something.
So if we have space station orbiting Earth and space station orbiting Mars and if we have some "lift" type contraption to get to orbital station easilly, we could transport frozen people (oh yeah, we need that developed too) between two stations quite cheap, considering that there is no need for applied force to move spacecraft in space as long as it's not near to any large mass.
In the future they will be shooting colonist spacebuses to Mars using some kind of orbital sling.
400 km elevator - check, Liquid Oxygen - check, 400 foot slingshot - check and maybe a map if you get knocked off your trajectory by an asteroid or something.
[/quote]
If the bankers pull the rug and everyone's a peasant, I'll quote you on that.
If the bankers pull the rug and everyone's a peasant, I'll quote you on that.
Technology advances exponentially, not linearly first off. Secondly, If we are able to make the breakthroughs necessary to make a return trip possible in a few years time instead of several decades, I am pretty sure we would have some sort of energy shield and artificial gravity to protect the vessel and the passengers.
[/quote]
That still doesn't mean they're going to figure out how to do any of these things at an "exponential" rate. For all you know it could be 300 years, 3,000 years, for all i know it could be next week. Fact is nobody knows if it will ever happen at all.
Technology advances exponentially, not linearly first off. Secondly, If we are able to make the breakthroughs necessary to make a return trip possible in a few years time instead of several decades, I am pretty sure we would have some sort of energy shield and artificial gravity to protect the vessel and the passengers.
That still doesn't mean they're going to figure out how to do any of these things at an "exponential" rate. For all you know it could be 300 years, 3,000 years, for all i know it could be next week. Fact is nobody knows if it will ever happen at all.
If the bankers pull the rug and everyone's a peasant, I'll quote you on that.
[/quote]
You are not quoting anyone, you'll be peasant in debt and I will be educated supervisor, cause I go to college and shit.
So when you start quoting something, I'll just tell to shut the fuck up and keep doing overtime to repay your debt, that you took so you don't starve cause all social nets were gone because of deregulations and austerity you blindly supported and you had to borrow from the banks in order to live.
And stick to the topic of Mars colonization, you thread-hijacking prick !
If the bankers pull the rug and everyone's a peasant, I'll quote you on that.
You are not quoting anyone, you'll be peasant in debt and I will be educated supervisor, cause I go to college and shit.
So when you start quoting something, I'll just tell to shut the fuck up and keep doing overtime to repay your debt, that you took so you don't starve cause all social nets were gone because of deregulations and austerity you blindly supported and you had to borrow from the banks in order to live.
And stick to the topic of Mars colonization, you thread-hijacking prick !
[/quote]
[/quote]
[/quote]
[/quote]
You don't have to be a commie to kill off the bourgeoisie
You don't have to be a commie to kill off the bourgeoisie
To kill off bushwazee one has to be a commie or special brand of commie, the BOLSHEVIK.
To kill off bushwazee one has to be a commie or special brand of commie, the BOLSHEVIK.
Seriously though, if there was a world-wide revolution over night and the bankers were lined up, I'd just give them their own island, let them fuck each other.
Seriously though, if there was a world-wide revolution over night and the bankers were lined up, I'd just give them their own island, let them fuck each other.
Seriously though, if there was a world-wide revolution over night and the bankers were lined up, I'd just give them their own island, let them fuck each other.
[/quote]
and through that island, all global capital will flow, making it the richest and most influential place on earth.
Seriously though, if there was a world-wide revolution over night and the bankers were lined up, I'd just give them their own island, let them fuck each other.
and through that island, all global capital will flow, making it the richest and most influential place on earth.
and through that island, all global capital will flow, making it the richest and most influential place on earth.
[/quote]
It'd be blockaded, imagine LOST.
and through that island, all global capital will flow, making it the richest and most influential place on earth.
It'd be blockaded, imagine LOST.
It'd be blockaded, imagine LOST.
[/quote]
what happens to their capital?
It'd be blockaded, imagine LOST.
what happens to their capital?
You still don't get it, do you ? Bourgeoisie is middle class.
You still don't get it, do you ? Bourgeoisie is middle class.
what happens to their capital?
[/quote]
I imagine they give it to otester
what happens to their capital?
I imagine they give it to otester
[/quote]
is incorrect.
is incorrect.
After eliminating anyone owning means of production (the meaning of the word) he doesn't want to look like communist. And it is hard not to look like a commie when proposing elimination of burgeoisie.
After eliminating anyone owning means of production (the meaning of the word) he doesn't want to look like communist. And it is hard not to look like a commie when proposing elimination of burgeoisie.
After eliminating anyone owning means of production (the meaning of the word) he doesn't want to look like communist. And it is hard not to look like a commie when proposing elimination of burgeoisie.
[/quote]
1917 all over again...
After eliminating anyone owning means of production (the meaning of the word) he doesn't want to look like communist. And it is hard not to look like a commie when proposing elimination of burgeoisie.
1917 all over again...
cool huh!?
cool huh!?
cool huh!?
[/quote]
yep, english piracy is the well from which all anglo dominance springs.. god bless sir francis drake.
cool huh!?
yep, english piracy is the well from which all anglo dominance springs.. god bless sir francis drake.
cool huh!?
[/quote]
I think their shipping interests tanked when they tried to sail to Edmonton.
cool huh!?
I think their shipping interests tanked when they tried to sail to Edmonton.
[quote user=Fido]I think their shipping interests tanked when they tried to sail to Edmonton.[/quote]
Good stuff.
Good stuff.
[/quote]
[/quote]
You don't have to be a commie to kill off the bourgeoisie
[/quote]
Provide an example.
You don't have to be a commie to kill off the bourgeoisie
Provide an example.
Provide an example.
[/quote]
I don't have to prove a negative, prove that you need to be a commie to kill bourgeoisie.
Provide an example.
I don't have to prove a negative, prove that you need to be a commie to kill bourgeoisie.
I don't have to prove a negative, prove that you need to be a commie to kill bourgeoisie.
[/quote]
This is your fundamental failing with regard to pretty much everything. If you state an opinion then it is up to you to provide evidence to support that statement.
You suggested that you don't have to be a commie (leftist) to engage in anti-bourgeois revolution. In other words, non-communists/leftists can/have engaged in such revolutionary behaviour against the bourgeois class. Provide evidence for this assertion.
I don't have to prove a negative, prove that you need to be a commie to kill bourgeoisie.
This is your fundamental failing with regard to pretty much everything. If you state an opinion then it is up to you to provide evidence to support that statement.
You suggested that you don't have to be a commie (leftist) to engage in anti-bourgeois revolution. In other words, non-communists/leftists can/have engaged in such revolutionary behaviour against the bourgeois class. Provide evidence for this assertion.
the roman servile wars.
NYC draft riots
french revolution
the roman servile wars.
NYC draft riots
french revolution
the roman servile wars.
[/quote]
Are you going to argue that Eunus wasn't an early socialist?
the roman servile wars.
Are you going to argue that Eunus wasn't an early socialist?
[/quote]
Are you going to argue that Eunus wasn't an early socialist?
[/quote]
if not wanting to be a slave is socialist then no.
Are you going to argue that Eunus wasn't an early socialist?
if not wanting to be a slave is socialist then no.
the roman servile wars.
NYC draft riots
french revolution
[/quote]
French revolution... c'mon, you know better than that. Robespierre and the Jacobins were the originators of much of modern socialist thought on the continent.
the roman servile wars.
NYC draft riots
french revolution
French revolution... c'mon, you know better than that. Robespierre and the Jacobins were the originators of much of modern socialist thought on the continent.
[/quote]
seemed to be aimed more at race rather than class. and it was only a riot....
seemed to be aimed more at race rather than class. and it was only a riot....
seemed to be aimed more at race rather than class.
[/quote]
I thought it was aimed at the $500.00 it took to buy your way out of it.
seemed to be aimed more at race rather than class.
I thought it was aimed at the $500.00 it took to buy your way out of it.
I thought it was aimed at the $500.00 it took to buy your way out of it.
[/quote]
that was one of the issues, but another was the influx of negro workers, which is why they went on the lynch.... more blacks died than members of the gentry.
I thought it was aimed at the $500.00 it took to buy your way out of it.
that was one of the issues, but another was the influx of negro workers, which is why they went on the lynch.... more blacks died than members of the gentry.
[/quote]
lol
lol
There was feodalism --> there were revolutions ---> constitutional monarchy ---> there was end of slavery and serfdom --> industrial age and rich industrialists and bankers who were non-aristorats, came up as the middle and middle-upper class ( THE BUSHWAZEE ) ---> they bought up everything and they were introducing new technology and less workers were needed so they were just kicked out and that's where "UNITE AND KILL ALL BUSHWAZEE" idea started to form up.
And when idea is coming from the top, it's: "let's do democracy and let's redistribute wealth democraticly" that's socialists, decemberists, trotskyists.
But when idea comes from the bottom it's : "UNITE AND KILL ALL BUSHWAZEE, WAAAGHHHH !!!" and that's bolshevism and commies fo' sho'.
[video]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eSJ4D2qznKo[/video]
^ The bad guys have a banner which says "Freedom or Death !" and Jolly Roger, because they are bad guys. Good guys have red flag and they clearly want to kill some bushwazee, as you can determine by the loud "Waaaaaghhhhhh !!!" they emit.
There was feodalism --> there were revolutions ---> constitutional monarchy ---> there was end of slavery and serfdom --> industrial age and rich industrialists and bankers who were non-aristorats, came up as the middle and middle-upper class ( THE BUSHWAZEE ) ---> they bought up everything and they were introducing new technology and less workers were needed so they were just kicked out and that's where "UNITE AND KILL ALL BUSHWAZEE" idea started to form up.
And when idea is coming from the top, it's: "let's do democracy and let's redistribute wealth democraticly" that's socialists, decemberists, trotskyists.
But when idea comes from the bottom it's : "UNITE AND KILL ALL BUSHWAZEE, WAAAGHHHH !!!" and that's bolshevism and commies fo' sho'.
^ The bad guys have a banner which says "Freedom or Death !" and Jolly Roger, because they are bad guys. Good guys have red flag and they clearly want to kill some bushwazee, as you can determine by the loud "Waaaaaghhhhhh !!!" they emit.
spartacus the bolshevik.
spartacus the bolshevik.
[/quote]
20 minutes of page shuffling by some basement dweller who lost all ability to read human handwriting ? Oh, dear god, no!
20 minutes of page shuffling by some basement dweller who lost all ability to read human handwriting ? Oh, dear god, no!
[/quote]
http://www.thefirstrow.eu/watch/126214/1/watch-spain-vs-italy.html
Thats in English bud
http://www.thefirstrow.eu/watch/126214/1/watch-spain-vs-italy.html
Thats in English bud
http://www.thefirstrow.eu/watch/126214/1/watch-spain-vs-italy.html
Thats in English bud
[/quote]
there's a bunch in english, but the most stable and clearest picture is the japanese one. they're closest maybe..?
www.vipbox.tv
EDIT: niiice
http://www.thefirstrow.eu/watch/126214/1/watch-spain-vs-italy.html
Thats in English bud
there's a bunch in english, but the most stable and clearest picture is the japanese one. they're closest maybe..?
www.vipbox.tv
EDIT: niiice
This is your fundamental failing with regard to pretty much everything. If you state an opinion then it is up to you to provide evidence to support that statement.
You suggested that you don't have to be a commie (leftist) to engage in anti-bourgeois revolution. In other words, non-communists/leftists can/have engaged in such revolutionary behaviour against the bourgeois class. Provide evidence for this assertion.
[/quote]
He's a moron who doesn't understand the term "burden of proof". He made the claim, it's his responsibility to prove his argument, not attempt to make others prove him wrong. If that's the way things worked, everyone would claim retarded fucking shit the way slotester does.
This is your fundamental failing with regard to pretty much everything. If you state an opinion then it is up to you to provide evidence to support that statement.
You suggested that you don't have to be a commie (leftist) to engage in anti-bourgeois revolution. In other words, non-communists/leftists can/have engaged in such revolutionary behaviour against the bourgeois class. Provide evidence for this assertion.
He's a moron who doesn't understand the term "burden of proof". He made the claim, it's his responsibility to prove his argument, not attempt to make others prove him wrong. If that's the way things worked, everyone would claim retarded fucking shit the way slotester does.
This is your fundamental failing with regard to pretty much everything. If you state an opinion then it is up to you to provide evidence to support that statement.
You suggested that you don't have to be a commie (leftist) to engage in anti-bourgeois revolution. In other words, non-communists/leftists can/have engaged in such revolutionary behaviour against the bourgeois class. Provide evidence for this assertion.
[/quote]
You don't need an ideology to murder.
[quote user=DigitalAntichrist] [quote user=mac]french revolution [/quote]
French revolution... c'mon, you know better than that. Robespierre and the Jacobins were the originators of much of modern socialist thought on the continent.
[/quote]
The same guy that got hooked on power and started wasting everyone?
This is your fundamental failing with regard to pretty much everything. If you state an opinion then it is up to you to provide evidence to support that statement.
You suggested that you don't have to be a commie (leftist) to engage in anti-bourgeois revolution. In other words, non-communists/leftists can/have engaged in such revolutionary behaviour against the bourgeois class. Provide evidence for this assertion.
You don't need an ideology to murder.
French revolution... c'mon, you know better than that. Robespierre and the Jacobins were the originators of much of modern socialist thought on the continent.
The same guy that got hooked on power and started wasting everyone?
You don't need an ideology to murder.[/quote]
A cop out and you know it. Your statement still needs to be supported with evidence. "You don't have to be a commie to kill off the bourgeoisie." A simple logical transformation allows you to take that statement into the realm of the empirical. Provide examples of non-leftist/communist revolutions which have rid society of the bourgeoisie.
[quote user=otester]
[quote user=DigitalAntichrist] and the Jacobins were the originators of much of modern socialist thought on the continent. [/quote]
The same guy that got hooked on power and started wasting everyone?
[/quote]
Yes. The same. The same man who paid with his life for his crimes... something your own moral doctrine would have been against because he personally didn't kill anyone during the terror. The notion of you finger pointing and damning is ludicrous... but, you just don't get that, do you.
Edit: Y'know, fuck it, I don't care. You're right, Otester, you're always right. There is only one truth in the history of the universe and that is 'Otester is always right'.
You don't need an ideology to murder.
A cop out and you know it. Your statement still needs to be supported with evidence. "You don't have to be a commie to kill off the bourgeoisie." A simple logical transformation allows you to take that statement into the realm of the empirical. Provide examples of non-leftist/communist revolutions which have rid society of the bourgeoisie.
The same guy that got hooked on power and started wasting everyone?
Yes. The same. The same man who paid with his life for his crimes... something your own moral doctrine would have been against because he personally didn't kill anyone during the terror. The notion of you finger pointing and damning is ludicrous... but, you just don't get that, do you.
Edit: Y'know, fuck it, I don't care. You're right, Otester, you're always right. There is only one truth in the history of the universe and that is 'Otester is always right'.
Edit: Y'know, fuck it, I don't care. You're right, Otester, you're always right. There is only one truth in the history of the universe and that is 'Otester is always right'.
[/quote]
If you'd have read the whole thread you'd know I wasn't even being serious anyways
Edit: Y'know, fuck it, I don't care. You're right, Otester, you're always right. There is only one truth in the history of the universe and that is 'Otester is always right'.
If you'd have read the whole thread you'd know I wasn't even being serious anyways
If you had read the whole thread you'd know I wasn't even being serious anyways
[/quote]
Bullshit. And again, I cite Poe's Law, because it applies to you in every way imaginable.
If you had read the whole thread you'd know I wasn't even being serious anyways
Bullshit. And again, I cite Poe's Law, because it applies to you in every way imaginable.
Seriously though, if there was a world-wide revolution over night and the bankers were lined up, I'd just give them their own island, let them fuck each other.
[/quote]
Seriously though, if there was a world-wide revolution over night and the bankers were lined up, I'd just give them their own island, let them fuck each other.
[/quote]
Poe's Law in action. And my earlier points still stand.
Poe's Law in action. And my earlier points still stand.